Skip to main content
TrustRadius
AWS WAF

AWS WAF

Overview

What is AWS WAF?

Amazon Web Services offers AWS WAF (web application firewall) to protect web applications from malicious behavior that might impede the applications functioning and performance, with customizable rules to prevent known harmful behaviors and an API for creating and deploying web…

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Resource Type - Request

$0.60

Cloud
per 1 million requests

Resource Type - Rule

$1.00

Cloud
per month (prorated hourly)

Resource Type - Web ACL

$5.00

Cloud
per month (prorated hourly)

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is AWS WAF?

AWS WAF Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(28)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-5 of 5)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Vinit Sharma | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Web applications are very vulnerable to attacks and deploying your applications from the cloud can expose them to even greater risk. To help secure their cloud web apps, administrators will use a Web Application Firewall. We deployed all the applications and servers on the AWS cloud, so we need more security. That is why we are using the AWS Web Application Firewall. WAF provides a lot of features that will secure your applications. We have been using cloud services for the last 3 years and most of the services are running on AWS. In our condition we need a lot of security.
  • Web traffic filtering
  • Bot Control
  • Real-time visibility
  • Easy to monitor web traffic
  • Prevent against any type of attack, like SQL code injection
  • Easy to create the rules
  • Easy to filter the packet as per your requirement
  • Less documentation available for help in configuration and maintenance
  • AWS should work on their technical support
  • High price
If you have deployed your servers and application and have them running through the cloud, then you should choose the AWS WAF for security. This is very good cloud firewall which will protect your application and servers from any type of attacks. On the cloud, everyone can easily reach your server, so you need to add more security. AWS WAF provides you a lot of features, which will help you to protect your cloud servers and applications from external attacks.
  • Protection against web attacks
  • Web traffic visibility
  • Easily monitor, block, or rate-limit bots
  • Security integrated
  • Very advanced features for protection against any type of attacks
  • Day-to-day updates for any type of cyber attacks
We have never used any other web application firewall.
Saim Jamali | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
AWS WAF is basically implemented to secure the web applications. I have a positive experience using the AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF). It has many features to protect our applications and solutions. The good thing about AWS WAF is it has the most friendly APIs for developers to create firewall rules for the web application. That makes our applications secure.
  • AWS WAF has the most developer-friendly API to create firewall rules.
  • AWS WAF provides OWASP security controls, which reduces developers' burden (i.e., SQL injection and cross-site scripting).
  • AWS WAF has customizable web security rules. The user can even push the rules through the API available, which is the great feature and helped me a lot.
  • It protects applications at layer 7 (HTTP) of the OSI model and not just layer 4 (TCP).
  • Need to enhance OWASP standards.
  • We are limited to five rate-based rules per AWS account.
AWS WAF is perhaps one of the best web application firewalls out there to date. Thankfully we have had no issues and we have been commended for using reputable vendors like AWS for security and privacy matters as part of our GDPR and ISO certifications. I would suggest that prospective customers use the CloudFormation templates provided by Amazon for creating the WAF.
  • It is a little expensive but helpful in many ways to secure applications.
  • Instant ability to update and change the WAF--easy to update and deploy changes and then review. Brilliant integration with other AWS services.
  • It is easy to deploy.
There are a number of reasons to select AWS WAF. Most importantly, it easy to deploy. It helps programmers to protect against a wide range of vulnerabilities like injection attacks, DDoS, and many others from OWASP top 10. It allows us to set up rules and blocks any threats based on the configured rules. Based on the pattern of attacks, it is always easy to add another rule.
The product is highly scalable. It is easy to configure the rules and thereby helps us to mitigate many vulnerabilities.
The interface and programming of the firewall provisions were easy to setup. Amazon clearly spent a lot of time figuring this out and perfecting it. It allows users to do customized configurations based on their needs. It provides protection against a number of security issues like XSS, SQL injection, etc. I would definitely recommend this for protecting your infra as you scale, since this basically protects and filters all requests hitting your application server.
Very comprehensive support is available. The user community also available to help with AWS WAF. The vendor that helped us purchase this service was very cooperative and helped us at every point, especially at the time of deployment. Since then, we take lot of help from its different communities. The user support is an other key reason to select AWS WAF.
maría jose gonzalez ortiz | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
AWS WAF is a really useful software when implemented at the departmental level. It allows the infrastructure of the applications that are being executed to be protected in a very simple way since the user can establish rules to stop the vulnerabilities that can cause a malfunction in such applications. This is why we have decided to implement it in the business applications development department to dismiss these vulnerabilities and thus be able to concentrate on the development of applications without that concern.
  • It allows custom rules to be established to stop attacks that may harm business applications.
  • Its cost is based only on what the user uses to establish rules that can protect applications from vulnerabilities.
  • The rules can be established by the user or those that the system already brings with it being able to be centralized to reuse them for the rest of the applications, which saves time.
  • The user can choose the traffic of their applications.
  • The cost depends on the number of rules assigned.
  • It deploys new rules fast and efficiently.
  • The documentation offered is somewhat confusing, so it would be ideal if it were much more direct and precise.
  • Your initial configuration may be confusing, so the best option is to use the rule templates provided by AWS.
  • Its configuration is not unified with AWS, so it must be done separately and it takes some time.
  • The number of rules to be established is somewhat limited.
AWS is ideal for implementation in scenarios where business applications are consuming more resources than they should. When AWS WAF is used it prevents this from happening and in this way applications tend to run as they should. It is ideal to establish custom rules and centralize them to protect different applications without having to re-create the same rules which helps save time, as well as allowing the usual attack patterns to be blocked, such as cross-site scripts and SQL injection.
  • Implementing this AWS service has been really favorable because when creating custom rules we give more specific protection to our applications against vulnerabilities that cause them to be consuming other resources or running with errors.
  • It allows us to control the traffic of our business applications, which is really favorable, given that in this way we can decide that you can access them and not.
  • It is extremely advantageous that we can establish rules in a centralized way since it saves time, as well as it allows us to protect several applications at the same time by reusing the rules established above.
  • It allows you to save time and money because we only pay for what is used.
Unlike these other AWS tools, WAF provides real-time traffic control, rules that can be customized according to the needs of the user, and is based on an implementation in the cloud which avoids the use of memory on computers as well as an account with a very affordable cost for any user or company.
Hanna Bedoya | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use AWS WAF in the Application Development department since it is useful to provide protection against the most common web attacks such as the injection of SQL code and site scripts, as well as to prevent these applications from consuming more resources than they should actually consume. For this, we develop custom rules that allow us to block such attacks and at the same time improve the visibility of web traffic.
  • Protect any application against the most common attacks.
  • Provides better visibility of web traffic.
  • It allows us to control the traffic in different ways in which it is enabled or blocked through the implementation of security rules developed personally according to our needs.
  • It is able to block common attacks such as SQL code injection.
  • It allows defining specific rules for applications, thus increasing web security as they are developed.
  • It is necessary to have knowledge about the software because otherwise inappropriate rules will be created.
  • Your configuration can be somewhat tedious.
  • Your support team takes a long time to answer the user's questions.
  • Its costs can be somewhat high, unlike other services since it is charged by the number of rules that are created.
AWS WAF is highly appropriate to interrupt or prevent cyber attacks because when implementing rules, whether they are specific or centralized, so any application that has these vulnerabilities is protected.

Implementing managed rules creates greater security to protect both API and applications.

If implemented along with other AWS tools, the security is much better, so if you want to protect applications against more specific attacks, it is ideal to integrate with Amazon CloudFront, which is a great benefit because it warns when thresholds are exceeded or specific attacks occur.

AWS WAF is ideal to avoid common web attacks. For more specific attacks and scenarios, I don't recommend this.
  • Our applications are less exposed to cyber attacks, which prevents them from getting out of control and consume much more resources than they should.
  • Saved us money by preventing attacks.
  • The traffic control is much more bearable.
  • App development is safer.
The use of this software was decided on because it is much easier to manage since the rules that are implemented can be specific or centralized. We also like it because you only pay for what you used.

Imperva SecureSphere requires a much higher learning curve.
Trello, Bitbucket, Lookout
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We were using WAF to protect our web application from cyber attacks by filtering the requests access to our web app. We created various rules and access control lists for blocking all the unwanted threats like SQL injections.
  • The deployment was pretty easy on the AWS platform
  • The cost of using AWF WAF is pretty low as you only have to pay for the rules that you are assigning and also, you can chose the traffic that you need for your application
  • The technical support is great, they are very good in understanding your problem and really helpful in providing the best solution
  • There is nothing much to dislike about this product
It is a pretty useful product if your web application is deployed on Amazon Web Service platform, else it could be a little complicated and pricey. It's useful if you want to lay down your own rules for security and traffic management of your web app. Having AWS WAF can assure you that the application that you are creating have integrated security features which can be maintained easily for future use. It does has some flaws, but it is backed up by Amazon which is doing a great job in everything that they are doing, so it surely has a great future.
  • The overall security of the web application increased effectively after deploying AWS WAF
  • No negative impacts were seen in the business
  • The developers were more confident in the overall security model of the web application being developed and it was easy to integrate WAF into the existing system as the application was also using AWS platform
We evaluated Imperva, but we were more convinced with AWS WAF because of the better pricing model, ease of deployment as we were already using the AWS platform which helping in ease of integration. The technical support for AWS WAF seemed to be better as they had better understanding of the overall system and architecture of the product, which helped us in getting a problem solved that was encountered while using AWS WAF. The amount of documentation and helpful material available online for AWS WAF made it the first choice for us to select this product over Imperva.
Return to navigation